رادار التجارب AI | ||
|---|---|---|
حالة التجربة السريرية NCT07493746 لـ خلل التنسج النمائي للورك هي لم يبدأ القبول بعد. اطلعوا على جميع التفاصيل في عرض البطاقة الخاص برادار التجارب السريرية وأدوات اكتشاف الذكاء الاصطناعي. أو يمكنكم طرح أي سؤال هنا. | ||
تجربة واحدة تطابق معايير الفلتر
عرض البطاقة
Hip Arthroscopy Versus Conservative Treatment for Borderline Hip Dysplasia ٢٤٨ تمارين رياضية
تفاصيل التجربة السريرية متاحة بشكل أساسي باللغة الإنجليزية. ومع ذلك، يمكن لـ رادار التجارب AI مساعدتك؛ ما عليك سوى النقر على «وصف الدراسة» لعرض ومناقشة معلومات التجربة باللغة التي اخترتها.
التجربة السريرية NCT07493746 هي دراسة تدخُّلية لـخلل التنسج النمائي للورك وهي لم يبدأ القبول بعد. من المقرر أن يبدأ التسجيل في ١٥ ذو الحجة ١٤٤٧ هـ لتجنيد ٢٤٨ مشاركًا. يقودها ChunBao Li، ومن المتوقع اكتمالها بحلول ١٨ صفر ١٤٥١ هـ. تم تحديث البيانات الأخيرة من ClinicalTrials.gov في ٦ شوال ١٤٤٧ هـ.
الملخص
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of hip arthroscopy versus individualized conservative treatment in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH), defined by a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18-25°. The main question it aims to answer is: which treatment approach, surgical or conservative, provides superior pain relief, functional recovery, and quality of life impro...عرض المزيد
وصف مفصل
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of hip arthroscopy versus individualized conservative treatment in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH). BDDH, defined by a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18-25°, represents a distinct condition between normal hips and developmental dysplasia of the hip, and its optimal management remains controv...عرض المزيد
العنوان الرسمي
Arthroscopic Hip Surgery Versus Individualized Conservative Treatment for Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
الحالات الطبية
خلل التنسج النمائي للوركمعرّفات دراسة أخرى
- 2026KY001-HS001
NCT معرّف
تاريخ البدء (فعلي)
2026-06-01
آخر تحديث مُنشور
2026-03-25
تاريخ الاكتمال (المقدر)
2029-06-30
عدد المشاركين المخطط لهم
٢٤٨
نوع الدراسة
تدخُّلية
المرحلة
غ/م
الحالة
لم يبدأ القبول بعد
الكلمات الرئيسية
Borderline hip dysplasia; Arthroscopy; Conservative treatment
الغرض الأساسي
العلاج
طريقة توزيع المشاركين
عشوائي
نموذج التدخل
التصميم المتوازي
التعمية
أحادي
مجموعات/التدخلات
| مجموعة المشاركين/الذراع | التدخل/العلاج |
|---|---|
تجريبيةHip arthroscopy | تنظير مفصل الورك The surgical group will undergo standardized hip arthroscopy with capsular management, acetabular rim limited trimming, labral repair, and Cam deformity correction when indicated. |
مقارن نشطIndividualized conservative treatment | Individualized conservative treatment The conservative treatment protocol includes patient education, NSAIDs for 2-4 weeks, chondroprotective supplementation for 8 weeks, and supervised progressive exercise training for 3 months. |
النتيجة الرئيسية
النتيجة الثانوية
| مقياس النتيجة | وصف القياس | الإطار الزمني |
|---|---|---|
The modified Harris Hip Score | The primary outcome was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), assessed at pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization. It is a clinician-reported instrument designed to evaluate hip function, commonly used to assess functional recovery before and after conservative treatment or hip arthroscopy. The scale encompasses domains such as pain, function, joint range of motion, and deformity, providing a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function (typically, 90-100 points represent excellent, 80-89 good, 70-79 fair, and \<70 poor). The instrument has been validated in a relevant population for this trial, with a minimum clinically important difference of 9 points and a patient-acceptable symptom state threshold of 78 points. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
| مقياس النتيجة | وصف القياس | الإطار الزمني |
|---|---|---|
Visual Analogue Scale | The pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score is a patient-reported instrument designed to quantify pain intensity. It uses a 100-mm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain," with a total score ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. This instrument has been validated in a relevant population for this trial. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
International Hip Outcome Tool-12 | The iHOT-12 (international Hip Outcome Tool-12) score is a patient-reported instrument designed to assess hip-related quality of life. Derived from the full iHOT-33 scale, this 12-item instrument covers domains such as symptoms, functional limitations, sports and recreational activities, and work-related concerns. It provides a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function and quality of life. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
General health: Short Form questionnaire-12 items | The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a validated and widely used health-related quality of life measure, commonly applied to assess hip conditions and treatment outcomes. The SF-12 generates the physical and mental component summary scores originally derived from the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) with considerable accuracy, while significantly reducing respondent burden. This 12-item scale comprises two dimensions: positive mental state and psychological distress symptoms. Scores from all items are summed to obtain a total score, with higher scores indicating more severe psychological distress. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
Patient satisfaction | Patient satisfaction was measured using questions that our team had used in previous trials involving patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for BDDH. During follow-up, we assessed satisfaction in all participants by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment you received?" Responses were rated on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 indicated dissatisfied and 10 indicated very satisfied. | 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
Clinical assessment | Clinical assessment performed at baseline and follow up visits consisted of range of passive hip movement, measured using a goniometer, and recording whether a participant experienced pain on each movement. Impingement tests determined whether a participant experienced pain on hip flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (FADIR) or flexion, abduction, and external rotation (FABER). | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
Adverse events | We recorded the number and type of adverse events up to 24 months. Any adverse events were recorded on the appropriate case report forms and returned to the clinical trial unit, where the chief investigator determined causality and expectedness. Serious adverse events deemed unexpected and related to the trial were reported to the Research Ethics Committee within 10 days. | post-randomization |
مساعد المشاركة
معايير الأهلية
الأعمار المؤهلة للدراسة
بالغ
العمر الأدنى للدراسة
18 Years
الجنس المؤهل
الكل
- Age 18-42 years (studies have reported age ≥42 years as a risk factor for hip arthroscopy in BDDH: HR=11.6, 95% CI: 2.5-53.9), either sex;
- Symptoms (anterior-lateral groin, lateral, or posterolateral hip pain or discomfort), physical examination findings (limp, clicking, locking, and limited range of motion), and imaging findings consistent with BDDH diagnosis (standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with Wiberg lateral center-edge angle \[LCEA\] 18-25°);
- Surgeon's assessment that the patient with BDDH will benefit from hip arthroscopy or conservative treatment;
- Full understanding of trial benefits and risks, willingness to participate in the intervention and complete follow-up, and signed informed consent.
- Standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph showing Tönnis grade ≥2 and/or joint space <2 mm;
- Standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph showing FEAR index >5°;
- Positive physical examination for joint instability: anterior apprehension test (HEER test), abduction-extension-external rotation test in lateral decubitus position (AB-HEER test), or prone external rotation test;
- History of high-energy hip trauma, previous ipsilateral or contralateral hip surgery, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Perthes disease, severe osteoporosis, tumor, acetabular stress fracture, or hypertrophic or inflammatory hip disease;
- Concomitant consciousness disorder, psychiatric illness, or neuromuscular dysfunction affecting lower limb function;
- Contraindications to hip arthroscopy (such as systemic or local infection).
الجهة المسؤولة عن الدراسة
ChunBao Li, الراعي-المحقق, Director of the Department of Sports Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital
لا توجد بيانات اتصال.