Trial Radar AI | ||
|---|---|---|
Clinical Trial NCT07491809 for Resin Cements, Dental Veneers, Orofacial Esthetic Scale is recruiting. See the Trial Radar Card View and AI discovery tools for all the details. Or ask anything here. | ||
One study matched filter criteria
Card View
Adhesive Cementation Materials and Techniques in Aesthetic Dentistry 60
Clinical Trial NCT07491809 is an interventional study for Resin Cements, Dental Veneers, Orofacial Esthetic Scale that is recruiting. It started on 30 September 2025 with plans to enroll 60 participants. Led by Riga Stradins University, it is expected to complete by 1 August 2029. The latest data from ClinicalTrials.gov was last updated on 24 March 2026.
Brief Summary
AIM: To determine the most effective cementation method and resin cement material for long term success of esthetical restorations TASKS: 1. Compare Panavia Veneer LC (Kuraray Noritake) cement with universal Panavia V5 (Kuraray Noritake) cement for porcelain veneer cementation in terms of marginal defects and discolouration; 2. Evaluating direct vs indirect restorations after 1-year and 3-year follow up periods in te...Show More
Official Title
Adhesive Cementation Materials and Techniques in Aesthetic Dentistry and Their Effect on the Longevity of Porcelain Veneers
Conditions
Resin CementsDental VeneersOrofacial Esthetic ScaleOther Study IDs
- 6-DN-20/2/2026
NCT ID Number
Start Date (Actual)
2025-09-30
Last Update Posted
2026-03-24
Completion Date (Estimated)
2029-08
Enrollment (Estimated)
60
Study Type
Interventional
PHASE
N/A
Status
Recruiting
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Design Allocation
Randomized
Interventional Model
Parallel
Masking
None (Open Label)
Arms / Interventions
| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
Active ComparatorPorcelain veneers Patients receiving porcelain veneers as an aesthetic treatment option | Porcelain veneers Teeth preparation, laboratory made porcelain restoration cementation with 2 different cements |
Active ComparatorDirect composite restoration Patients receiving direct composite injection moulding as an aesthetic treatment option | Direct composite Digital modelling of teeth shapes, restoration with injectable composite directly |
Primary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
Patient satisfaction with porcelain veneers vs direct composite restorations using OES (orofacial aesthetic scale) | OES is a questionnaire with 8 questions regarding orofacial appearance. The higher the score, the more satisfied the patient is. 7 questions evaluate specific items, and number 8 is an overall assessment. | 6 months, 1 year, 3 years |
| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
Comparison of 2 veneer cements in terms of complications and discolouration | Data on following variables will be collected for all abutment teeth:
Restoration condition (defects related to restoration - ceramic fractures, cracks, loss of retention, discolouration; if present, calculated as a percentage from total restorations); Condition of the abutment teeth (secondary caries, endodontic complications; if present, calculated as a percentage from total restorations); Periodontal condition (probing depth in mm, bleeding on probing present or no; gum recessions in mm); | 6 months, 1 year, 3 years |
Participation Assistant
Eligibility Criteria
Eligible Ages
Child, Adult, Older Adult
Eligible Sexes
All
- healthy periodontium, needs at least 4 veneers, enamel around all veneer borders
- heavy bruxism, poor oral hygiene, active periodontal disease
Malmö University
Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.
Study Responsible Party
Mara Gaile, Principal Investigator, Researcher, D.D.S., Riga Stradins University
Study Central Contact
Contact: Mara Gaile, DDS, +37126010210, [email protected]
Contact: Una Soboleva, Professor, +37129441268, [email protected]
1 Study Locations in 1 Countries
Riga Stradins University, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia
Una Soboleva, Professor, Contact, +37129441268, [email protected]
Recruiting