Trial Radar AI | ||
|---|---|---|
Clinical Trial NCT07493746 for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip is not yet recruiting. See the Trial Radar Card View and AI discovery tools for all the details. Or ask anything here. | ||
One study matched filter criteria
Card View
Hip Arthroscopy Versus Conservative Treatment for Borderline Hip Dysplasia 248 Exercise-Based
Clinical Trial NCT07493746 is an interventional study for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and is currently not yet recruiting. Enrollment is planned to begin on 1 June 2026 and continue until the study accrues 248 participants. Led by ChunBao Li, this study is expected to complete by 30 June 2029. The latest data from ClinicalTrials.gov was last updated on 25 March 2026.
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of hip arthroscopy versus individualized conservative treatment in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH), defined by a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18-25°. The main question it aims to answer is: which treatment approach, surgical or conservative, provides superior pain relief, functional recovery, and quality of life impro...Show More
Detailed Description
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of hip arthroscopy versus individualized conservative treatment in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH). BDDH, defined by a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18-25°, represents a distinct condition between normal hips and developmental dysplasia of the hip, and its optimal management remains controv...Show More
Official Title
Arthroscopic Hip Surgery Versus Individualized Conservative Treatment for Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Conditions
Developmental Dysplasia of the HipOther Study IDs
- 2026KY001-HS001
NCT ID Number
Start Date (Actual)
2026-06-01
Last Update Posted
2026-03-25
Completion Date (Estimated)
2029-06-30
Enrollment (Estimated)
248
Study Type
Interventional
PHASE
N/A
Status
Not yet recruiting
Keywords
Borderline hip dysplasia; Arthroscopy; Conservative treatment
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Design Allocation
Randomized
Interventional Model
Parallel
Masking
Single
Arms / Interventions
| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
ExperimentalHip arthroscopy | Hip arthroscopy The surgical group will undergo standardized hip arthroscopy with capsular management, acetabular rim limited trimming, labral repair, and Cam deformity correction when indicated. |
Active ComparatorIndividualized conservative treatment | Individualized conservative treatment The conservative treatment protocol includes patient education, NSAIDs for 2-4 weeks, chondroprotective supplementation for 8 weeks, and supervised progressive exercise training for 3 months. |
Primary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
The modified Harris Hip Score | The primary outcome was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), assessed at pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization. It is a clinician-reported instrument designed to evaluate hip function, commonly used to assess functional recovery before and after conservative treatment or hip arthroscopy. The scale encompasses domains such as pain, function, joint range of motion, and deformity, providing a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function (typically, 90-100 points represent excellent, 80-89 good, 70-79 fair, and \<70 poor). The instrument has been validated in a relevant population for this trial, with a minimum clinically important difference of 9 points and a patient-acceptable symptom state threshold of 78 points. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
Visual Analogue Scale | The pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score is a patient-reported instrument designed to quantify pain intensity. It uses a 100-mm line anchored by "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain," with a total score ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. This instrument has been validated in a relevant population for this trial. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
International Hip Outcome Tool-12 | The iHOT-12 (international Hip Outcome Tool-12) score is a patient-reported instrument designed to assess hip-related quality of life. Derived from the full iHOT-33 scale, this 12-item instrument covers domains such as symptoms, functional limitations, sports and recreational activities, and work-related concerns. It provides a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function and quality of life. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
General health: Short Form questionnaire-12 items | The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) is a validated and widely used health-related quality of life measure, commonly applied to assess hip conditions and treatment outcomes. The SF-12 generates the physical and mental component summary scores originally derived from the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) with considerable accuracy, while significantly reducing respondent burden. This 12-item scale comprises two dimensions: positive mental state and psychological distress symptoms. Scores from all items are summed to obtain a total score, with higher scores indicating more severe psychological distress. | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
Patient satisfaction | Patient satisfaction was measured using questions that our team had used in previous trials involving patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for BDDH. During follow-up, we assessed satisfaction in all participants by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment you received?" Responses were rated on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 indicated dissatisfied and 10 indicated very satisfied. | 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
Clinical assessment | Clinical assessment performed at baseline and follow up visits consisted of range of passive hip movement, measured using a goniometer, and recording whether a participant experienced pain on each movement. Impingement tests determined whether a participant experienced pain on hip flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (FADIR) or flexion, abduction, and external rotation (FABER). | Pre-intervention, and at 12 and 24 months post-randomization |
Adverse events | We recorded the number and type of adverse events up to 24 months. Any adverse events were recorded on the appropriate case report forms and returned to the clinical trial unit, where the chief investigator determined causality and expectedness. Serious adverse events deemed unexpected and related to the trial were reported to the Research Ethics Committee within 10 days. | post-randomization |
Participation Assistant
Eligibility Criteria
Eligible Ages
Adult
Minimum Age
18 Years
Eligible Sexes
All
- Age 18-42 years (studies have reported age ≥42 years as a risk factor for hip arthroscopy in BDDH: HR=11.6, 95% CI: 2.5-53.9), either sex;
- Symptoms (anterior-lateral groin, lateral, or posterolateral hip pain or discomfort), physical examination findings (limp, clicking, locking, and limited range of motion), and imaging findings consistent with BDDH diagnosis (standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with Wiberg lateral center-edge angle \[LCEA\] 18-25°);
- Surgeon's assessment that the patient with BDDH will benefit from hip arthroscopy or conservative treatment;
- Full understanding of trial benefits and risks, willingness to participate in the intervention and complete follow-up, and signed informed consent.
- Standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph showing Tönnis grade ≥2 and/or joint space <2 mm;
- Standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph showing FEAR index >5°;
- Positive physical examination for joint instability: anterior apprehension test (HEER test), abduction-extension-external rotation test in lateral decubitus position (AB-HEER test), or prone external rotation test;
- History of high-energy hip trauma, previous ipsilateral or contralateral hip surgery, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Perthes disease, severe osteoporosis, tumor, acetabular stress fracture, or hypertrophic or inflammatory hip disease;
- Concomitant consciousness disorder, psychiatric illness, or neuromuscular dysfunction affecting lower limb function;
- Contraindications to hip arthroscopy (such as systemic or local infection).
Study Responsible Party
ChunBao Li, Sponsor-Investigator, Director of the Department of Sports Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital
No contact data.