임상 레이더 AI | ||
|---|---|---|
임상시험 NCT06052059은(는) 궤양성 대장염에 대해 진행중, 모집종료 상태입니다. 모든 세부 정보를 보려면 임상시험 레이더 카드 뷰와 AI 발견 도구를 확인하거나 여기에서 무엇이든 물어보세요. | ||
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tulisokibart (MK-7240) in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (MK-7240-001) 3상 1,020
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Program to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-7240 in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
- 7240-001
- PR200-301 (기타 식별자) (PrometheusBio)
- jRCT2031230563 (등록 식별자) (jRCT)
- U1111-1296-0203 (등록 식별자) (UTN)
- U1111-1314-0050 (등록 식별자) (UTN)
- 2023-507473-17-00 (등록 식별자) (EU CT)
- 2024-518603-22-00 (등록 식별자) (EU CT)
| 참가자 그룹/시험군 | 개입/치료 |
|---|---|
실험적Study 1: High Dose Induction, High Dose Maintenance Participants receive high dose intravenous (IV) tulisokibart, followed by a high dose subcutaneous (SC) tulisokibart regimen. | IV Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered intravenously SC Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered subcutaneously |
실험적Study 1: High Dose Induction, Low Dose Maintenance Participants receive high dose IV tulisokibart, followed by a low dose SC tulisokibart regimen. | IV Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered intravenously SC Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered subcutaneously SC 위약 Placebo matching SC tulisokibart |
실험적Study 1: Low Dose Induction, Low Dose Maintenance Participants receive low dose IV tulisokibart, followed by a low dose SC tulisokibart regimen. | IV Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered intravenously SC Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered subcutaneously SC 위약 Placebo matching SC tulisokibart |
위약 대조군Study 1: Placebo Participants receive IV placebo, followed by an SC placebo regimen. | IV Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered intravenously 정맥 주사 위약 Placebo matching IV tulisokibart SC 위약 Placebo matching SC tulisokibart |
실험적Study 1: High Dose Extension Participants receive a high dose SC tulisokibart regimen. Participants may be enrolled in this arm after completing participation in their original arm, if they meet protocol-specific prerequisites. | SC Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered subcutaneously |
실험적Study 1: Low Dose Extension Participants receive a low dose SC tulisokibart and placebo regimen. Participants may be enrolled in this arm after completing participation in their original arm, if they meet protocol-specific prerequisites. | SC Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered subcutaneously SC 위약 Placebo matching SC tulisokibart |
실험적Study 2: High Dose Induction Participants receive high dose IV tulisokibart. | IV Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered intravenously |
실험적Study 2: Low Dose Induction Participants receive low dose IV tulisokibart. | IV Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered intravenously |
위약 대조군Study 2: Placebo Participants receive IV placebo. | IV Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered intravenously 정맥 주사 위약 Placebo matching IV tulisokibart SC 위약 Placebo matching SC tulisokibart |
실험적Study 2: High Dose Extension Participants receive a high dose SC tulisokibart regimen. Participants may be enrolled in this arm only after completing participation in their original arm, if they meet protocol-specific prerequisites. | SC Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered subcutaneously |
실험적Study 2: Low Dose Extension Participants receive a low dose SC tulisokibart regimen. Participants may be enrolled in this arm only after completing participation in their original arm, if they meet protocol-specific prerequisites. | SC Tulisokibart Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds human tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A), administered subcutaneously SC 위약 Placebo matching SC tulisokibart |
| 결과변수 | 측정값 설명 | 시간 범위 |
|---|---|---|
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per Modified Mayo Score (MMS) at Week 12 | The Modified Mayo Score (MMS) is a composite score of ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: Endoscopic subscore (ES), scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); Stool frequency subscore (SFS), scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS), scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical Remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per MMS at Week 52 | The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical Remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS. | Week 52 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per MMS at Week 12 | The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical Remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS. | Week 12 |
| 결과변수 | 측정값 설명 | 시간 범위 |
|---|---|---|
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who experience an AE will be reported. | Up to approximately 52 weeks |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported. | Up to approximately 52 weeks |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Per Partial Modified Mayo Score (pMMS) at Week 2 | The partial Modified Mayo Score (pMMS) is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-6, calculated by summing two subscores: SFS, scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); RBS, scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical response is defined as pMMS reduction of 1 or more points and 30% or more, plus a reduction of 1 or more points in RBS or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1. | Week 2 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 | Endoscopic improvement is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore (ES) of 0 or 1. The ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy on a 0-3 scale of increasing severity. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Response Per MMS at Week 12 | The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical response is defined as an MMS reduction of 2 or more points and 30% or more, plus a reduction of more than 1 point in RBS or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) at Week 12 | HEMI is defined as a Geboes score of 3.1 or less and ES of 0 or 1. The Geboes score is a histologic grading system for inflammation in UC with scores ranging from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe inflammation. ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per pMMS at Week 12 | pMMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-6, calculated by summing two subscores: SFS, scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); RBS, scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical remission per pMMS is defined as an RBS of 0 and SFS of ≤1. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 12 | ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). Endoscopic remission is defined as an ES of 0. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Reporting No Bowel Urgency at Week 12 | Bowel urgency is measured using an NRS, which rates bowel urgency on a 0-11 scale of increasing severity. Resolution is defined as a score of 0 or 1 in participants who had a baseline score of 3 or more. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Reporting No Abdominal Pain at Week 12 | Abdominal pain is measured on a 0-4 NRS of increasing pain severity. Absence of abdominal pain is defined as a rating of 0. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission at Week 12 | The IBDQ measures health related quality of life in subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. It consists of 32 questions each with a graded response of 1 (worst) to 7 (best). The score ranges from 32 to 224. IBDQ remission is defined as a score of at least 170. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Change from Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 12 | The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item measure that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function, scored on a 0-52 point scale, with greater scores indicating a better fatigue-related quality of life. The change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score will be presented. | Baseline and Week 12 |
Percentage of Diagnostic Assay Positive (Dx+) Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per MMS at Week 12 | Dx+ participants are those who meet protocol-specific diagnostic assay criteria during screening. The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical Remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS. | Week 12 |
Percentage of Dx+ Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 | Dx+ participants are those who meet protocol-specific diagnostic assay criteria during screening. Endoscopic improvement is defined as ES of 0 or 1. The ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy on a 0-3 scale of increasing severity. | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Remission (HER) at Week 12 | HER is defined as a Geboes score of less than 2 and ES of 0 or 1. The Geboes score is a histologic grading system for inflammation in UC with scores ranging from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe inflammation. ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). | Week 12 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52 | Endoscopic improvement is defined as ES of 0 or 1. The ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy on a 0-3 scale of increasing severity. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission Per MMS at Week 52 | The Modified Mayo Score (MMS) is a composite score of ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: Endoscopic subscore (ES), scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); Stool frequency subscore (SFS), scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS), scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Corticosteroid-free clinical remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS, and no corticosteroid use for ≥90 days before Week 52. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving HEMI at Week 52 | HEMI is defined as a Geboes score of 3.1 or less and ES of 0 or 1. The Geboes score is a histologic grading system for inflammation in UC with scores ranging from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe inflammation. ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per pMMS at Week 52 | pMMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-6, calculated by summing two subscores: SFS, scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); RBS, scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical remission per pMMS is defined as an RBS of 0 and SFS of ≤1. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Clinical Remission Per MMS at Both Week 12 and Week 52 | The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Sustained clinical remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS, at both Week 12 and Week 52. | Week 12 and Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Reporting No Bowel Urgency at Week 52 | Bowel urgency is measured using an NRS, which rates bowel urgency on a 0-11 scale of increasing severity. Resolution is defined as a score of 0 or 1 in participants who had a baseline score of 3 or more. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Reporting No Abdominal Pain at Week 52 | Abdominal pain is measured on a 0-4 NRS of increasing pain severity. Absence of abdominal pain is defined as a rating of 0. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 52 | ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). Endoscopic remission is defined as an ES of 0. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants with Sustained Endoscopic Improvement at Both Week 12 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic improvement is defined as an ES of 0 or 1 at both Week 12 and Week 52. The ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy on a 0-3 scale of increasing severity. | Week 12 and Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving HER at Week 52 | HER is defined as a Geboes score of less than 2 and ES of 0 or 1. The Geboes score is a histologic grading system for inflammation in UC with scores ranging from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe inflammation. ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving IBDQ Remission at Week 52 | The IBDQ measures health related quality of life in subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. It consists of 32 questions each with a graded response of 1 (worst) to 7 (best). The score ranges from 32 to 224. IBDQ remission is defined as a score of at least 170. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue Score at Week 52 | The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item measure that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function, scored on a 0-52 point scale, with greater scores indicating a better fatigue-related quality of life. The change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score will be presented. | Baseline and Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Dx+ Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per MMS at Week 52 | Dx+ participants are those who meet protocol-specific diagnostic assay criteria during screening. The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical Remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS. | Week 52 |
Study 1: Percentage of Dx+ Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52 | Dx+ participants are those who meet protocol-specific diagnostic assay criteria during screening. Endoscopic improvement is defined as ES of 0 or 1. The ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy on a 0-3 scale of increasing severity. | Week 52 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With One or More AEs | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who experience an AE will be reported. | Up to approximately 12 weeks |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported. | Up to approximately 12 weeks |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants with Clinical Response Per pMMS at Week 2 | pMMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-6, calculated by summing two subscores: SFS, scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); RBS, scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical response is defined as pMMS reduction of 1 or more points and 30% or more, plus a reduction of 1 or more points in RBS or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1. | Week 2 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12 | Endoscopic improvement is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore (ES) of 0 or 1. The ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy on a 0-3 scale of increasing severity. | Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Response Per MMS at Week 12 | The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical response is defined as an MMS reduction of 2 or more points and 30% or more, plus a reduction of more than 1 point in RBS or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1. | Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving HEMI at Week 12 | HEMI is defined as a Geboes score of 3.1 or less and ES of 0 or 1. The Geboes score is a histologic grading system for inflammation in UC with scores ranging from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe inflammation. ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). | Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per pMMS at Week 12 | pMMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-6, calculated by summing two subscores: SFS, scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); RBS, scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical remission per pMMS is defined as an RBS of 0 and SFS of ≤1. | Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 12 | ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration). Endoscopic remission is defined as an ES of 0. | Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Reporting No Bowel Urgency at Week 12 | Bowel urgency is measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS), which rates bowel urgency on a 0-11 scale of increasing severity. | Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Reporting No Abdominal Pain at Week 12 | Abdominal pain is measured on a 0-4 NRS of increasing pain severity. Absence of abdominal pain is defined as a rating of 0. | Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving IBDQ Remission at Week 12 | The IBDQ measures health related quality of life in subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. It consists of 32 questions each with a graded response of 1 (worst) to 7 (best). The score ranges from 32 to 224. IBDQ remission is defined as a score of at least 170. | Week 12 |
Study 2: Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue Score at Week 12 | The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item measure that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function, scored on a 0-52 point scale, with greater scores indicating a better fatigue-related quality of life. The change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score will be presented. | Baseline and Week 12 |
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving HER at Week 12 | HER is defined as a Geboes score of less than 2 and ES of 0 or 1. The Geboes score is a histologic grading system for inflammation in UC with scores ranging from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe inflammation. | Week 12 |
Has had ulcerative colitis (UC) (from onset of symptoms) for at least 3 months before randomization
Has moderately to severely active UC
Weight ≥40 kg
Satisfies at least 1 of the following criteria:
- Has had an inadequate response or loss of response to 1 or more protocol-specified UC treatments
- Protocol specified corticosteroid dependence
- Has been intolerant to 1 or more protocol-specified UC treatments
Is on treatment with any protocol-specified drugs during the study and meets drug stabilization requirements, as applicable
Adolescent participants ≥16 and <18 years of age can participate if approved by the country or regulatory/health authority
A participant assigned female sex at birth is eligible to participate if not pregnant or breastfeeding and Is not a participant of childbearing potential (POCBP); or is a POCBP and uses an acceptable contraceptive method, or is abstinent from penile-vaginal intercourse as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long-term and persistent basis), has a negative highly sensitive pregnancy test (urine or serum) as required by local regulations within 24 hours (for a urine test) or 72 hours (for a serum test) before the first dose of study intervention, medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity has been reviewed by the investigator to decrease the risk for inclusion of a POCBP with an early undetected pregnancy
- Has a diagnosis of Crohn's Disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-undefined) or other types of colitis or enteritis that may confound efficacy assessment.
- Has a current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon
- Has UC limited to the rectum (i.e, must have evidence of UC extending beyond the rectosigmoid junction, which is ~10 cm from the anal margin)
- Has a current or impending need for colostomy or ileostomy
- Has had a total proctocolectomy or partial colectomy
- Has received fecal microbial transplantation within 4 weeks before randomization
- Has had UC exacerbation requiring hospitalization within 2 weeks before screening
- Has prior or current evidence of definite colonic dysplasia except for low-grade dysplasia that has been completely removed
- Has any active or serious infections without resolution after adequate treatment
- Has had cytomegalovirus infection that resolved less than 4 weeks before screening
- Has a transplanted organ which requires continued immunosuppression
- Has a history of cancer (except fully treated non-melanoma skin cell cancers or cervical carcinoma in situ after complete surgical removal) within the last 5 years
- Is known to be infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Has evidence of active tuberculosis (TB), latent TB not successfully treated (per local guidelines), or inadequately treated TB (for participants with history of TB)
- Has confirmed or suspected COVID-19
- Has a history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to screening
- Has had major surgery within 3 months before screening or has a major surgery planned during the study
- Is currently receiving or is planning to receive total parenteral nutrition at any time during study treatment
- Has received UC-related antibiotics and has not been on stable doses for at least 14 days before randomization or has discontinued these medications within 14 days of randomization
- Requires treatment with a therapy that does not adhere to the protocol-specified guidance parameters
- Has received protocol-specified prohibited medications
- Has had prior exposure to tulisokibart or another anti-tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A) antibody
Kang-won-do
Kyonggi-do
Pusan-Kwangyokshi
Seoul
Taegu-Kwangyokshi
Taejon-Kwangyokshi
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
New York
North Carolina
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires F.D.
Santa Fe Province
Tucumán Province
New South Wales
Queensland
South Australia
Victoria
Tyrol
Vienna
Oost-Vlaanderen
Vlaams-Brabant
Federal District
Minas Gerais
Rio Grande do Sul
São Paulo
Pazardzhik
Sofia (stolitsa)
Alberta
British Columbia
Nova Scotia
Ontario
Quebec
Los Ríos Region
Region M. de Santiago
Anhui
Beijing Municipality
Chongqing Municipality
Fujian
Guangdong
Hebei
Henan
Hubei
Hunan
Jiangsu
Jiangxi
Shaanxi
Shandong
Shanghai Municipality
Sichuan
Tianjin Municipality
Xinjiang
Yunnan
Zhejiang
Antioquia
Atlántico
Cundinamarca
Risaralda Department
Valle del Cauca Department
City of Zagreb
County of Osijek-Baranja
Split-Dalmatia County
Brno-mesto
Central Bohemia
Praha 4
Nacional
Pirkanmaa
Pohjois-Karjala
Southwest Finland
Alpes-Maritimes
Aquitaine
Bouches-du-Rhone
Champagne-Ardenne
Doubs
Gard
Hauts-de-Seine
Isere
Languedoc-Roussillon
Meurthe-et-Moselle
Pays de la Loire Region
Rhone
Somme
Val-de-Marne
Adjara
Baden-Wurttemberg
Bavaria
Hesse
Lower Saxony
North Rhine-Westphalia
Rhineland-Palatinate
Saxony
Schleswig-Holstein
Attica
Central Macedonia
Crete
Baranya
Bekescsaba
Bács-Kiskun county
Heves County
Komárom-Esztergom
Veszprém megye
Cagliari
Foggia
Lazio
Lombardy
Milano
Napoli
Roma
Sicily
Veneto
Verona
Aichi-ken
Chiba
Ehime
Fukuoka
Gunma
Hiroshima
Hokkaido
Hyōgo
Ibaraki
Ishikawa-ken
Iwate
Kanagawa
Mie-ken
Osaka
Shizuoka
Tokyo
Yamanashi
Ādaži
Kaunas County
Vilniaus Miestas
Johor
Kelantan
Negeri Sembilan
Selangor
Guanajuato
Jalisco
Mexico City
Nuevo León
Yucatán
Gelderland
North Brabant
North Holland
Overijssel
South Holland
Waikato Region
Wellington Region
Akershus
Greater Poland Voivodeship
Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship
Lesser Poland Voivodeship
Lower Silesian Voivodeship
Masovian Voivodeship
Silesian Voivodeship
West Pomeranian Voivodeship
Łódź Voivodeship
Lisbon District
București
Cluj
Mureș County
Timiș County
Beograd
Srednjebanatski Okrug
Central Singapore
Banská Bystrica Region
Bratislava Region
Košice Region
Nitra Region
Presov
Gauteng
Western Cape
Barcelona
Bizkaia
Madrid
Madrid, Comunidad de
Valencia
Valenciana, Comunitat
Stockholm County
Uppsala County
Östergötland County
Canton of Bern
Canton of St. Gallen
Canton of Zurich
Changhua
Hsinchu
Istanbul
Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast
Kyivska Oblast
Lviv Oblast
Vinnytsia Oblast
Volyn Oblast
Bristol, City of
Cambridgeshire
Devon
England
Hampshire
London, City of
Walsall