Radar de Estudos Clínicos

This study will also explore mediators and moderators of intervention effects, which is key for efficiently targeting psychological resources in the oncology setting and may be particularly relevant for deciding between digital intervention approaches for individual patients. Research on moderators of in-person mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in cancer populations suggests that patients with worse psychological functioning at study entry tend to benefit more from these interventions, with mixed effects for other predictors. It is unclear whether more distressed patients will show similar benefits in digital interventions that lack in-person check-ins and monitoring by instructors. Thus, investigators will assess baseline distress along with key demographic characteristics and social determinants of health (e.g., race, ethnicity, education, rurality) as potential moderators. With respect to mediators, emotion regulation strategies including rumination and self-kindness have been shown to mediate effects of in-person MBIs on stress and depression in cancer populations, consistent with the broader theoretical and empirical literature on mindfulness. Determining whether these factors predict and explain effects of digital MBIs, and whether these effects differ by delivery mode, is necessary for achieving optimal outcomes of these interventions. Further, investigators will collect information on the cost-effectiveness of these programs, which is critical for payors to make coverage decisions, healthcare providers and employers to make adoption decisions, and patients to make participation decisions.