Trial Radar AI | ||
|---|---|---|
Clinical Trial NCT07201818 for Fibromyalgia is not yet recruiting. See the Trial Radar Card View and AI discovery tools for all the details. Or ask anything here. | ||
One study matched filter criteria
Card View
LET for Fibromyalgia 40 Randomized Double-Blind One-Time Treatment
Clinical Trial NCT07201818 is an interventional study for Fibromyalgia and is currently not yet recruiting. Enrollment is planned to begin on 1 June 2026 and continue until the study accrues 40 participants. Led by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, this study is expected to complete by 1 January 2028. The latest data from ClinicalTrials.gov was last updated on 20 February 2026.
Brief Summary
The study is a double blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel group trial conducted at UT Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center. The purpose of this research study is to determine the effectiveness of Lymphatic Enhancement Technology (LET) treatment in patients with fibromyalgia. Participants will complete assessments of heart rate and blood pressure, pain thresholds to mechanical stimuli, and completion of quali...Show More
Detailed Description
At enrollment, participants will complete a baseline assessment including collection of demographic information (age, race/ethnicity, BMI, employment status, duration of symptoms, smoking history), past/current medical history, and current medications. The primary outcome measure of severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms will be collected using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) at ...Show More
Official Title
A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Lymphatic Enhancement Technology in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia
Conditions
FibromyalgiaOther Study IDs
- STU20251385
NCT ID Number
Start Date (Actual)
2026-06
Last Update Posted
2026-02-20
Completion Date (Estimated)
2028-01
Enrollment (Estimated)
40
Study Type
Interventional
PHASE
N/A
Status
Not yet recruiting
Keywords
Lymphatic enhancement technology (LET)
Chronic pain
Fibromyalgia
Autonomic Nervous System
Quantitative Sensory Testing
Chronic pain
Fibromyalgia
Autonomic Nervous System
Quantitative Sensory Testing
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Design Allocation
Randomized
Interventional Model
Parallel
Masking
Single
Arms / Interventions
| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
ExperimentalActive LET group Participants in the active/real LET group will be treated with a machine that emits lights, sounds, and electrostatic energy. Three additional treatments will be administered over three weeks. | Lymphatic enhancement technology (LET) Lymphatic Enhancement Technology (LET) is an FDA-approved electrotherapeutic modality, with indications for addressing local lymphatic and vascular circulation as well as muscle pain and spasm. The Aria LET Elite Instrument (Arcturus Star, Cortez, Colorado) will be utilized for the intervention group. |
Sham ComparatorSham LET group Participants in the placebo/sham LET group will be treated with a machine that emits lights and sounds, but no electrostatic energy. Three additional treatments will be administered over three weeks. | Sham Lymphatic Enhancement Technology (LET) A separate modified Aria Elite LET Instrument (Arcturus Star, Cortez, Colorado) will be utilized for the sham group. The sham LET device used for the control group will emit a light and sound similar to the true LET device, but will not emit energy waves. |
Primary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 2 from baseline | The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'. | Baseline, Week 2 pre-treatment |
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 3 from baseline | The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'. | Baseline, Week 3 pre-treatment |
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 4 from baseline | The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'. | Baseline, Week 4 pre-treatment |
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 8 from baseline | The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
Change quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by PPT immediately after treatment 1 | A pressure pain threshold (PPT) PPT measurements will be taken with a hand-held Algomed algometer mounted with a 1-cm2 probe and calibrated in kilopascals. Pressure will be applied at a constant rate of 30 kPa/s to two different locations bilaterally:1) Upper trapezius muscle at midway point between the C7 spinous process and acromion; 2) Gluteal muscles at midway point between PSIS and greater trochanter. Three measurements will be taken at each site and averaged to determine the final value for that site. Measurements will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores indicate more severe impact. | Baseline, week 1 post treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by PPT immediately after treatment 4 | A pressure pain threshold (PPT) PPT measurements will be taken with a hand-held Algomed algometer mounted with a 1-cm2 probe and calibrated in kilopascals. Pressure will be applied at a constant rate of 30 kPa/s to two different locations bilaterally:1) Upper trapezius muscle at midway point between the C7 spinous process and acromion; 2) Gluteal muscles at midway point between PSIS and greater trochanter. Three measurements will be taken at each site and averaged to determine the final value for that site. Measurements will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores indicate more severe impact. | Week 4 pre-treatment, week 4 post-treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by PPT at week 4 post treatment from baseline | A pressure pain threshold (PPT) PPT measurements will be taken with a hand-held Algomed algometer mounted with a 1-cm2 probe and calibrated in kilopascals. Pressure will be applied at a constant rate of 30 kPa/s to two different locations bilaterally:1) Upper trapezius muscle at midway point between the C7 spinous process and acromion; 2) Gluteal muscles at midway point between PSIS and greater trochanter. Three measurements will be taken at each site and averaged to determine the final value for that site. Measurements will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores indicate more severe impact. | Baseline, week 4 post- treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by temporal summation (TS) to pin prick immediately after treatment 1 | A pin prick stimulator will be used to assess for TS at the same testing sites used for PPT. Subjects will first be exposed to a single stimulus, and then to 10 repetitive stimuli with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 1 second applied within an area 1cm in diameter. Participants will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using a numeric pain rating from 0-10 for the single stimulus, and then for the peak pain of the train of 10 stimuli. Two rounds of testing will be performed, and an average of the values will be calculated to obtain a single value for the single stimulus and the peak stimulus of the train. The ratio of the peak stimulus of the train to the single stimulus pain score will be calculated and used for analysis. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate more severe impact. Subjects will also report whether any aftersensations are present at either 15 or 30 seconds after each of the two trials. | Baseline, week 1 post treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by temporal summation (TS) to pin prick immediately after treatment 4 | A pin prick stimulator will be used to assess for TS at the same testing sites used for PPT. Subjects will first be exposed to a single stimulus, and then to 10 repetitive stimuli with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 1 second applied within an area 1cm in diameter. Participants will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using a numeric pain rating from 0-10 for the single stimulus, and then for the peak pain of the train of 10 stimuli. Two rounds of testing will be performed, and an average of the values will be calculated to obtain a single value for the single stimulus and the peak stimulus of the train. The ratio of the peak stimulus of the train to the single stimulus pain score will be calculated and used for analysis. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate more severe impact. Subjects will also report whether any aftersensations are present at either 15 or 30 seconds after each of the two trials. | Week 4 pre-treatment, week 4 post-treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by temporal summation (TS) to pin prick at week 4 post treatment from baseline | A pin prick stimulator will be used to assess for TS at the same testing sites used for PPT. Subjects will first be exposed to a single stimulus, and then to 10 repetitive stimuli with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 1 second applied within an area 1cm in diameter. Participants will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using a numeric pain rating from 0-10 for the single stimulus, and then for the peak pain of the train of 10 stimuli. Two rounds of testing will be performed, and an average of the values will be calculated to obtain a single value for the single stimulus and the peak stimulus of the train. The ratio of the peak stimulus of the train to the single stimulus pain score will be calculated and used for analysis. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate more severe impact. Subjects will also report whether any aftersensations are present at either 15 or 30 seconds after each of the two trials. | Baseline, week 4 post treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by CPM score immediately after treatment 1 | Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be assessed via a PPT test stimulus applied to the upper trapezius for three trials. The average of the three PPT trials at the upper trapezius collected during the conditioning stimulus will be subtracted from the average of the three PPT trials collected before the CPT. Measurements of PPT will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores on CPM indicate more severe impact | Baseline, week 1 post treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by CPM score immediately after treatment 4 | Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be assessed via a PPT test stimulus applied to the upper trapezius for three trials. The average of the three PPT trials at the upper trapezius collected during the conditioning stimulus will be subtracted from the average of the three PPT trials collected before the CPT. Measurements of PPT will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores on CPM indicate more severe impact | Week 4 pre treatment, week 4 post treatment |
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by CPM score at week 4 post treatment from baseline | Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be assessed via a PPT test stimulus applied to the upper trapezius for three trials. The average of the three PPT trials at the upper trapezius collected during the conditioning stimulus will be subtracted from the average of the three PPT trials collected before the CPT. Measurements of PPT will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores on CPM indicate more severe impact | Baseline, week 4 post treatment |
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by Heart rate change during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 1 | Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include heart rate collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of HR will be expressed in BPM with a range of 0-200. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the HR values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact. | Baseline, week 1 post treatment |
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by Heart rate change during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 4 | Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include heart rate collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of HR will be expressed in BPM with a range of 0-200.Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the HR values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact. | Week 4 pre treatment, week 4 post treatment |
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by Heart rate change during cold pressor task (CPT) at week 4 post treatment from baseline | Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include heart rate collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of HR will be expressed in BPM with a range of 0-200.Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the HR values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact. | Baseline, week 4 post treatment |
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by change in systolic blood and diastolic pressure during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 1 | Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include blood pressure collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of blood pressure will be expressed in mmHg with a range of 0-200 for systolic and diastolic. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the systolic and diastolic values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact. | Baseline, week 1 post treatment |
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by change in systolic blood and diastolic pressure during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 4 | Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include blood pressure collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of blood pressure will be expressed in mmHg with a range of 0-200 for systolic and diastolic. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the systolic and diastolic values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact. | Week 4 pre treatment, week 4 post treatment |
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by change in systolic blood and diastolic pressure during cold pressor task (CPT) at week 4 post treatment from baseline | Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include blood pressure collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of blood pressure will be expressed in mmHg with a range of 0-200 for systolic and diastolic. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the systolic and diastolic values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact. | Baseline, week 4 post treatment |
Participation Assistant
Eligibility Criteria
Eligible Ages
Adult, Older Adult
Minimum Age
18 Years
Eligible Sexes
Female
- meeting the American College of Rheumatology 2016 diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia,
- female sex,
- ages 18-65 years,
- never received LET treatment,
- an FIQ score ≥39 (moderate severity), and
- no medication changes within 14 days prior to the start of the study or for the duration of the study.
- currently receiving any other form of mind-body or exercise treatment,
- active blood clots,
- unexplained calf pain with concern for DVT,
- active infection,
- congestive heart failure,
- presence of an implanted pacemaker,
- pregnant or may be pregnant,
- active cancer or receiving cancer treatment, and
- having received any steroid injections within past 3 months.
Study Responsible Party
Jason Zafereo, Principal Investigator, Professor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Study Central Contact
Contact: Jason Zafereo, M.P.T, Ph.D., 214/648-1002, [email protected]
1 Study Locations in 1 Countries
Texas
UT Southwestern Medical Center in the Allied Health Physical Therapy Clinic, Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Jason Zafereo, M.P.T, Ph.D., Contact, 214/648-1002, [email protected]