IA Trial Radar
O estudo clínico NCT07201818 para Fibromialgia está ainda não recrutando. Consulte a visualização em cartões do Radar de Estudos Clínicos e as ferramentas de descoberta de IA para ver todos os detalhes. Ou pergunte qualquer coisa aqui.
Um estudo corresponde aos critérios do filtro
Visualização em cartões

LET for Fibromyalgia 40 Randomizado Duplo-cego Tratamento único

Ainda não recrutando
Os detalhes do estudo clínico estão disponíveis principalmente em inglês. No entanto, a IA Trial Radar pode ajudar! Basta clicar em 'Explicar o estudo' para visualizar e discutir as informações do estudo no idioma selecionado.
O estudo clínico NCT07201818 é um estudo intervencionista para Fibromialgia. Seu status atual é: ainda não recrutando. O recrutamento está programado para iniciar em 1 de junho de 2026, com o objetivo de incluir 40 participantes. Coordenado por o Centro Médico Sudoeste da Universidade do Texas e deve ser concluído em 1 de janeiro de 2028. Essas informações foram atualizadas no ClinicalTrials.gov em 20 de fevereiro de 2026.
Resumo
The study is a double blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel group trial conducted at UT Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center. The purpose of this research study is to determine the effectiveness of Lymphatic Enhancement Technology (LET) treatment in patients with fibromyalgia. Participants will complete assessments of heart rate and blood pressure, pain thresholds to mechanical stimuli, and completion of quali...Mostrar mais
Descrição detalhada
At enrollment, participants will complete a baseline assessment including collection of demographic information (age, race/ethnicity, BMI, employment status, duration of symptoms, smoking history), past/current medical history, and current medications. The primary outcome measure of severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms will be collected using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) at ...Mostrar mais
Título oficial

A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Lymphatic Enhancement Technology in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia

Condições médicas
Fibromialgia
Outros IDs do estudo
  • STU20251385
Número NCT
Data de início (real)
2026-06
Última atualização postada
2026-02-20
Data de conclusão (estimada)
2028-01
Inscrição (estimada)
40
Tipo de estudo
Intervencionista
FASE
N/A
Status
Ainda não recrutando
Palavras-chave
Lymphatic enhancement technology (LET)
Chronic pain
Fibromyalgia
Autonomic Nervous System
Quantitative Sensory Testing
Propósito principal
Tratamento
Alocação do design
Randomizado
Modelo de intervenção
Paralelo
Cegamento (Mascaramento)
Cego simples
Braços / Intervenções
Grupo de participantes/BraçoIntervenção/Tratamento
ExperimentalActive LET group
Participants in the active/real LET group will be treated with a machine that emits lights, sounds, and electrostatic energy. Three additional treatments will be administered over three weeks.
Lymphatic enhancement technology (LET)
Lymphatic Enhancement Technology (LET) is an FDA-approved electrotherapeutic modality, with indications for addressing local lymphatic and vascular circulation as well as muscle pain and spasm. The Aria LET Elite Instrument (Arcturus Star, Cortez, Colorado) will be utilized for the intervention group.
Comparador simuladoSham LET group
Participants in the placebo/sham LET group will be treated with a machine that emits lights and sounds, but no electrostatic energy. Three additional treatments will be administered over three weeks.
Sham Lymphatic Enhancement Technology (LET)
A separate modified Aria Elite LET Instrument (Arcturus Star, Cortez, Colorado) will be utilized for the sham group. The sham LET device used for the control group will emit a light and sound similar to the true LET device, but will not emit energy waves.
Desfecho primário
Medida de desfechoDescrição da medidaPrazo
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 2 from baseline
The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'.
Baseline, Week 2 pre-treatment
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 3 from baseline
The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'.
Baseline, Week 3 pre-treatment
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 4 from baseline
The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'.
Baseline, Week 4 pre-treatment
Change in severity and functional impact of fibromyalgia symptoms as measured by FIQR at week 8 from baseline
The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) measures pain intensity and assesses how symptoms, including pain, interfere with a person's life. It is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of fibromyalgia over the last seven days. The FIQR's assessment of pain intensity and interference is found within its three domains: Symptoms, Function and Overall Impact. By combining scores from these domains, the FIQR provides a comprehensive picture of how fibromyalgia symptoms, including pain intensity and interference, affect a patient's overall well-being. All questions are based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being 'worst'.
Baseline, Week 8
Desfecho secundário
Medida de desfechoDescrição da medidaPrazo
Change quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by PPT immediately after treatment 1
A pressure pain threshold (PPT) PPT measurements will be taken with a hand-held Algomed algometer mounted with a 1-cm2 probe and calibrated in kilopascals. Pressure will be applied at a constant rate of 30 kPa/s to two different locations bilaterally:1) Upper trapezius muscle at midway point between the C7 spinous process and acromion; 2) Gluteal muscles at midway point between PSIS and greater trochanter. Three measurements will be taken at each site and averaged to determine the final value for that site. Measurements will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores indicate more severe impact.
Baseline, week 1 post treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by PPT immediately after treatment 4
A pressure pain threshold (PPT) PPT measurements will be taken with a hand-held Algomed algometer mounted with a 1-cm2 probe and calibrated in kilopascals. Pressure will be applied at a constant rate of 30 kPa/s to two different locations bilaterally:1) Upper trapezius muscle at midway point between the C7 spinous process and acromion; 2) Gluteal muscles at midway point between PSIS and greater trochanter. Three measurements will be taken at each site and averaged to determine the final value for that site. Measurements will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores indicate more severe impact.
Week 4 pre-treatment, week 4 post-treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by PPT at week 4 post treatment from baseline
A pressure pain threshold (PPT) PPT measurements will be taken with a hand-held Algomed algometer mounted with a 1-cm2 probe and calibrated in kilopascals. Pressure will be applied at a constant rate of 30 kPa/s to two different locations bilaterally:1) Upper trapezius muscle at midway point between the C7 spinous process and acromion; 2) Gluteal muscles at midway point between PSIS and greater trochanter. Three measurements will be taken at each site and averaged to determine the final value for that site. Measurements will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores indicate more severe impact.
Baseline, week 4 post- treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by temporal summation (TS) to pin prick immediately after treatment 1
A pin prick stimulator will be used to assess for TS at the same testing sites used for PPT. Subjects will first be exposed to a single stimulus, and then to 10 repetitive stimuli with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 1 second applied within an area 1cm in diameter. Participants will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using a numeric pain rating from 0-10 for the single stimulus, and then for the peak pain of the train of 10 stimuli. Two rounds of testing will be performed, and an average of the values will be calculated to obtain a single value for the single stimulus and the peak stimulus of the train. The ratio of the peak stimulus of the train to the single stimulus pain score will be calculated and used for analysis. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate more severe impact. Subjects will also report whether any aftersensations are present at either 15 or 30 seconds after each of the two trials.
Baseline, week 1 post treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by temporal summation (TS) to pin prick immediately after treatment 4
A pin prick stimulator will be used to assess for TS at the same testing sites used for PPT. Subjects will first be exposed to a single stimulus, and then to 10 repetitive stimuli with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 1 second applied within an area 1cm in diameter. Participants will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using a numeric pain rating from 0-10 for the single stimulus, and then for the peak pain of the train of 10 stimuli. Two rounds of testing will be performed, and an average of the values will be calculated to obtain a single value for the single stimulus and the peak stimulus of the train. The ratio of the peak stimulus of the train to the single stimulus pain score will be calculated and used for analysis. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate more severe impact. Subjects will also report whether any aftersensations are present at either 15 or 30 seconds after each of the two trials.
Week 4 pre-treatment, week 4 post-treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by temporal summation (TS) to pin prick at week 4 post treatment from baseline
A pin prick stimulator will be used to assess for TS at the same testing sites used for PPT. Subjects will first be exposed to a single stimulus, and then to 10 repetitive stimuli with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 1 second applied within an area 1cm in diameter. Participants will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using a numeric pain rating from 0-10 for the single stimulus, and then for the peak pain of the train of 10 stimuli. Two rounds of testing will be performed, and an average of the values will be calculated to obtain a single value for the single stimulus and the peak stimulus of the train. The ratio of the peak stimulus of the train to the single stimulus pain score will be calculated and used for analysis. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate more severe impact. Subjects will also report whether any aftersensations are present at either 15 or 30 seconds after each of the two trials.
Baseline, week 4 post treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by CPM score immediately after treatment 1
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be assessed via a PPT test stimulus applied to the upper trapezius for three trials. The average of the three PPT trials at the upper trapezius collected during the conditioning stimulus will be subtracted from the average of the three PPT trials collected before the CPT. Measurements of PPT will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores on CPM indicate more severe impact
Baseline, week 1 post treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by CPM score immediately after treatment 4
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be assessed via a PPT test stimulus applied to the upper trapezius for three trials. The average of the three PPT trials at the upper trapezius collected during the conditioning stimulus will be subtracted from the average of the three PPT trials collected before the CPT. Measurements of PPT will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores on CPM indicate more severe impact
Week 4 pre treatment, week 4 post treatment
Change in quantitative sensory testing (QST) as assessed by CPM score at week 4 post treatment from baseline
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) will be assessed via a PPT test stimulus applied to the upper trapezius for three trials. The average of the three PPT trials at the upper trapezius collected during the conditioning stimulus will be subtracted from the average of the three PPT trials collected before the CPT. Measurements of PPT will be expressed in kPa with a range of 0-800. Lower scores on CPM indicate more severe impact
Baseline, week 4 post treatment
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by Heart rate change during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 1
Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include heart rate collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of HR will be expressed in BPM with a range of 0-200. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the HR values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact.
Baseline, week 1 post treatment
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by Heart rate change during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 4
Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include heart rate collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of HR will be expressed in BPM with a range of 0-200.Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the HR values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact.
Week 4 pre treatment, week 4 post treatment
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by Heart rate change during cold pressor task (CPT) at week 4 post treatment from baseline
Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include heart rate collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of HR will be expressed in BPM with a range of 0-200.Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the HR values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact.
Baseline, week 4 post treatment
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by change in systolic blood and diastolic pressure during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 1
Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include blood pressure collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of blood pressure will be expressed in mmHg with a range of 0-200 for systolic and diastolic. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the systolic and diastolic values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact.
Baseline, week 1 post treatment
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by change in systolic blood and diastolic pressure during cold pressor task (CPT) immediately after treatment 4
Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include blood pressure collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of blood pressure will be expressed in mmHg with a range of 0-200 for systolic and diastolic. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the systolic and diastolic values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact.
Week 4 pre treatment, week 4 post treatment
Change in autonomic cardiovascular testing (ACT) as assessed by change in systolic blood and diastolic pressure during cold pressor task (CPT) at week 4 post treatment from baseline
Autonomic cardiovascular function measures of interest will include blood pressure collected during the two conditions (before and during CPT). Measurements of blood pressure will be expressed in mmHg with a range of 0-200 for systolic and diastolic. Cardiovascular and sympathetic responses during each CPT will be calculated by subtracting the systolic and diastolic values collected during the 2nd minute of the CPT from the values collected during the rest period before the CPT. Lower scores on CPT indicate more severe impact.
Baseline, week 4 post treatment
Assistente de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis
Adulto, Idoso
Idade mínima
18 Years
Sexos elegíveis
Feminino
  • meeting the American College of Rheumatology 2016 diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia,
  • female sex,
  • ages 18-65 years,
  • never received LET treatment,
  • an FIQ score ≥39 (moderate severity), and
  • no medication changes within 14 days prior to the start of the study or for the duration of the study.

  • currently receiving any other form of mind-body or exercise treatment,
  • active blood clots,
  • unexplained calf pain with concern for DVT,
  • active infection,
  • congestive heart failure,
  • presence of an implanted pacemaker,
  • pregnant or may be pregnant,
  • active cancer or receiving cancer treatment, and
  • having received any steroid injections within past 3 months.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center logoCentro Médico Sudoeste da Universidade do Texas
Arcturus Star Products logoArcturus Star Products
Responsável pelo estudo
Jason Zafereo, Investigador principal, Professor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Contato central do estudo
Contato: Jason Zafereo, M.P.T, Ph.D., 214/648-1002, [email protected]
1 Locais do estudo em 1 países

Texas

UT Southwestern Medical Center in the Allied Health Physical Therapy Clinic, Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Jason Zafereo, M.P.T, Ph.D., Contato, 214/648-1002, [email protected]