Trial Radar KI
Die klinische Studie NCT07133880 für COPD (Chronisch obstruktive Lungenerkrankung) ist offene rekrutierung. In der Kartenansicht des Klinische Studien Radar und den KI-Entdeckungstools finden Sie alle Details. Oder stellen Sie hier Ihre Fragen.
Eine Studie entspricht den Filterkriterien
Kartenansicht

Compare the Effects of Nebulizer Versus Inhaler Based Therapy for COPD Using Long-acting Bronchodilators Phase 4 72

Offene Rekrutierung
Die Details der klinischen Studie sind hauptsächlich auf Englisch verfügbar. Trial Radar KI kann jedoch helfen! Klicken Sie einfach auf 'Studie erklären', um die Informationen zur Studie in der ausgewählten Sprache anzuzeigen und zu besprechen.
Die klinische Studie NCT07133880 untersucht Behandlung im Zusammenhang mit COPD (Chronisch obstruktive Lungenerkrankung). Diese interventionsstudie der Phase 4 hat den Status offene rekrutierung und startete am 5. Dezember 2023. Es ist geplant, 72 Teilnehmer aufzunehmen. Durchgeführt von University of Tennessee wird der Abschluss für 1. Dezember 2025 erwartet. Die Daten von ClinicalTrials.gov wurden zuletzt am 27. August 2025 aktualisiert.
Kurzbeschreibung
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators delivered via nebulizers vs. dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in symptomatic participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC ≤ 70%) and show significant air trapping (RV ≥ 120% of predicted).

The investigators hypothesize that, in patients with symptomatic COPD, therapy with a long-act...

Mehr anzeigen
Ausführliche Beschreibung
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel group, double dummy, phase four, 13-week clinical trial with 1:1 allocation comparing long-acting anti-muscarinic agent (LAMA; Umeclidinium 62.5 μg once daily) and long acting beta-agonist (LABA; Vilanterol 25 μg once daily) delivered by DPI (Group A), vs a nebulized LAMA/LABA combination (revefenacin 175 μg once daily and formoterol 20 μg twice daily) (Group B) among sympt...Mehr anzeigen
Offizieller Titel

Differentiating the Effects of Long-acting Bronchodilators Administered by Nebulizer Versus Dry Powder Inhaler in Symptomatic Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Erkrankungen
COPD (Chronisch obstruktive Lungenerkrankung)
Weitere Studien-IDs
  • 4889
  • Institutional Review Board (Andere Kennung) (The University of Tennessee Health Science Center)
NCT-Nummer
Studienbeginn (tatsächlich)
2023-12-05
Zuletzt aktualisiert
2025-08-27
Studienende (vorauss.)
2025-12-01
Geplante Rekrutierung
72
Studientyp
Interventionsstudie
PHASE
Phase 4
Status
Offene Rekrutierung
Stichwörter
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
COPD
Nebulizer
Dry Powder Inhaler
Primäres Ziel
Behandlung
Zuteilungsmethode
Randomisiert
Interventionsmodell
Parallel
Verblindung
Dreifach verblindet
Studienarme/Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe/StudienarmIntervention/Behandlung
Aktives VergleichspräparatDPI Treatment Group
Group A: Receives Umeclidinium 62.5 µg and Vilanterol 25 µg via DPI and Revefenacin placebo and formoterol placebo (sterile normal saline) via nebulizer at treatment visit # 2 and will continue with assigned treatment and placebo for 12 weeks
umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µg
DPI Treatment
Placebo ( Revefenacin and Formoterol )
Placebo Nebulizer Treatment
Aktives VergleichspräparatNebulizer Treatment Group
Group B: Receives revefenacin 175 µg and formoterol 20 µg via nebulizer and placebo DPI at treatment visit # 2 and will continue with assigned treatment and placebo for 12 weeks
Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µg
Nebulizer Treatment
Placebo DPI
Placebo DPI Treatment
Hauptergebnismessungen
ErgebnismessungBeschreibung der MessungZeitrahmen
Difference Between the Values of Area Under the Response Curve for Inspiratory Capacity (IC)
Difference between the values of area under the response curve for inspiratory capacity (IC) from baseline through six hours (AUC IC 0-6h) after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI OR Proportion of participants achieving improvement of \>2 points in their CAT score compared to baseline OR Proportion of participants achieving reduction of 4 points in SGRQ score compared to baseline
From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)
Nebenergebnismessungen
ErgebnismessungBeschreibung der MessungZeitrahmen
Percentage change in Residual Volume (RV) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI
From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)
Percentage change in Total Lung Capacity (TLC) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI
From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)
Percentage change in airway resistance (Raw) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI
From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)
Maximum percentage change in inspiratory capacity between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI
From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)
Maximum percentage change in RV between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA combination
From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)
Maximum Percentage Change in Airway Resistance (Raw) between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA
From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)
Correlation of peak inspiratory flow rate with peak IC change from baseline
From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)
Comparison of CAT scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer
From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)
Comparison of SGRQ scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer
At baseline (Visit 2, Week 2), and at study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)
Change in TDI in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer
Measured at Week 4 (Phone Visit 1), Week 8 (Phone Visit 2), and Week 12 (Study Visit 3)
Change in CAT scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer
From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)
Change in SGRQ scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer
Measured at study visit 2 at week 2 and study completion visit 3 at week 12
Correlation of CAT with LF and LH change (inspiratory capacity and residual volume change) with patient-reported outcomes including the SGRQ and the TDI
Baseline (Visit 2) through Study Completion (Visit 3 / Week 12)
Correlation of LH with patient-reported outcomes including scores from the CAT, SGRQ and TDI
Baseline (Visit 2) through Study Completion (Visit 3 / Week 12)
Teilnahme-Assistent
Eignungskriterien

Zugelassene Altersgruppen
Erwachsene, Ältere Erwachsene
Mindestalter
40 Years
Zugelassene Geschlechter
Alle
  1. Age > 40 years
  2. Either sex
  3. Current smoker or past cigarette smoking history of > 10 pack-years
  4. Symptoms of COPD (cough, sputum production, shortness of breath)
  5. Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) score ≥2 or CAT score ≥10 at Screening/Run-in visit
  6. A PIFR > 30 at screening
  7. FEV1/FVC ratio < 70% (within the past 12 months)
  8. Residual volume (RV) ≥ 120% predicted (within the past 12 months

  1. Diagnosis of asthma (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  2. Previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate > 110 bpm) or ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia) (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  3. Acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks of patient study registration (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  4. Acute exacerbation of congestive heart failure (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  5. Acute exacerbation of COPD within 8 weeks (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  6. Recent (within 8 weeks) h/o eye surgery (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  7. Uncontrolled glaucoma (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  8. Known diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  9. Known diagnosis of chronic renal insufficiency (defined as a previous serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL - Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  10. Intolerance to any of the study drugs
  11. Patients receiving long-term azithromycin
  12. Planned surgery requiring hospital admission within 3 months
  13. Currently enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program
  14. Inability to give informed consent
  15. Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or subdermal implants)
  16. Inability to understand instructions or comply with the study protocol
  17. Participation in another investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of patient study registration

Medical history can be confirmed by medical records and/or verbal confirmation from patients. However, Inclusion criteria 6 & 7 must be verified by a previous PFT report dated within 6 months of screening

Theravance Biopharma logoTheravance Biopharma
Keine Kontaktdaten vorhanden
1 Studienstandorte in 1 Ländern

Tennessee

The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920, United States
Tracy Walker, Study Coordinator, Kontakt, 865-305-4297, [email protected]
Rajiv Dhand, MD, Hauptprüfer
Isaac Biney, MD, Prüfarzt
Samuel Treat, MD, Prüfarzt
Paul Terry, PhD, Prüfarzt
Offene Rekrutierung